For over seven decades, the 60/40 portfolio allocation has been the stalwart strategy of retirement planners with a high degree of success until recently. More recently, the tried and true portfolio mix has come under pressure, mounting uncharacteristic losses that may indicate it has lost its luster. What has changed for the 60/40 allocation, and has it become too risky?


Background on the 60/40 Allocation


The 60/40 portfolio has been around for more than 70 years, but it was popularized by Vanguard founder and investing great John Bogle. The research and data available at the time showed it to be an optimal allocation using stocks to drive returns and bonds to provide ballast during volatile markets. It was considered a balanced portfolio that could achieve growth while minimizing volatility and downside risk. A 60/40 portfolio regularly outperformed all stock or all bond portfolios.


It worked because, during most of that period, stocks and bonds had a low correlation with one another. When stocks were performing well, bonds were underperforming, and vice versa. But in 2021, that equilibrium suddenly changed. In the final quarter of 2021 through the current month, stocks and bonds became highly correlated, with both performing poorly. Instead of a portfolio where bonds are tempering the slumping returns of stocks, they have now become an additional drag on it. That’s not what investors sign up for with a 60/40 portfolio allocation.


It’s important to understand that the 60/40 rule was established long ago under different economic and market conditions. It performed exceptionally well over the last several decades because it was a time of historic gains in the bond market. That’s because interest rates had been in a sustained decline since the 1980s. Not anymore.


That was Then. This is Now


With the recent surge in inflation, the likes we haven’t seen in more than 40 years, the conditions for bonds have changed to the detriment of 60/40. To cool inflation, interest rates must rise. When interest rates rise, bond prices fall, which they have been doing for most of this year. Interest rates will continue to climb depending on how long and high inflation will run, making it difficult for bonds to fulfill their role as a defensive hedge.


If you believe the experts, investors in a 60/40 portfolio should downsize their return expectations over the next decade. Vanguard forecasts a relatively low median annual return of less than 4% through 2031. That’s well below the 7% annual return target of a 60/40 portfolio, primarily due to declining bond prices. 


Is it Time to Consider Total Return Alternatives?


If high inflation persists, investors now have to worry about the possibility of negative returns on their investments. For some investors, especially those with longer time horizons, it may be time to change the allocation rule with less emphasis on bonds and more emphasis on total returns. Several bond alternatives provide diversification while enhancing total return opportunities.


Utility stocks: Utility stocks act similarly to bonds because they offer high yields and relative safety. Some of the better utility stocks have a record of steady earnings and dividend growth. While utility stock prices can be sensitive to rising interest rates like bonds, they offer higher total return potential. 


High-quality dividend-paying stocks: High-quality companies with a long history of paying annual dividends and increasing them over time are a reliable source of income. They also tend to be less volatile than the rest of the stock market, making them a great diversifier. The dividend acts as a cushion against declining share prices. 


Real estate investment trusts (REITs): REITs are professionally managed real estate portfolios that hold up well in an inflationary environment. Many are required to pay out up to 90 percent of their earnings as dividends, making them a reliable income source. 


Though it may not be entirely over for the venerable 60/40 portfolio allocation, it may be a while before it recaptures its magic, which calls for some rule adjustments in the meantime. The adjustments don’t have to be radical—perhaps moving from a 60/40 stock and bond allocation to a 60/20/20 stock, bond, utility stock, high-quality dividend stock allocation, or some combination of all the above. 


However, any changes to a long-term investment strategy should always be made in consultation with an investment advisor with the expertise and tools to help you assess your circumstances and create an allocation consistent with your investment objectives, time horizon, and risk profile.





Are you on track for retirement?


Making sure you will be ready for retirement can be overwhelming. Funding your retirement accounts over the years is a critical part of your journey to the retirement of your dreams. An experienced Financial Advisor can help you navigate the complexities of investment management. Talk to a Financial Advisor>

Dream. Plan. Do.

Platt Wealth Management offers financial plans to answer your important financial questions. Where are you? Where do you want to be? How can you get there? Our four-step financial planning process is designed to be a road map to get you where you want to go while providing flexibility to adapt to changes along the route. We offer stand-alone plans or full wealth management plans that include our investment management services. Give us a call today to set up a complimentary review. 619-255-9554.


[ultimatemember form_id=”1899″]